Pulmonary Embolism Risk Score Interpretation
|Score > 6:||High probability|
|Score >= 2 and <= 6:||Moderate probability|
|Score < 2:||Low Probability|
Cut point of 4 points or less is considered as PE unlikely as long as the specific D-Dimer test is negative.
- Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et. al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000 Mar;83(3):416-20.
- Geersing GJ, Erkens PM, Lucassen WA, et al. Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345
- Guo DJ, Zhao C, Zou YD, Huang XH, Hu JM, Guo L. Values of the Wells and revised Geneva scores combined with D-dimer in diagnosing elderly pulmonary embolism patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128(8):1052-7.
ThePhysician.org includes risk tools and content intended for use by healthcare professionals. These tools do not give professional advice; physicians and other healthcare professionals who use these tools or databases should exercise their own clinical judgment as to the information they provide.
Please read Disclaimer for additional information